VITAL STATISTICS

Posts Tagged ‘project’

Project: Introspection - Oral Communication Skills

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

Yesterday, I announced the beginning of Project: Introspection, a series of blogs in which I will describe skills, qualities and lessons I’ve learned in my theatrical endeavors.  One of the skills that I’ve developed largely thanks to my actor training is oral communication skills.  Acting onstage taught me how to be comfortable speaking in front of people, from small groups to large audiences that fill a 5,000 seat house.  Okay, I’ve never actually spoken in front of five thousand people, but I probably could, no problem.  In addition, working with crews and other actors requires clear, concise and well-organized communication skills that allow for maximum expression of knowledge with minimal interference and distraction.  In other words, it means fewer screwups and mistakes.

One of my former directors was brilliantly creative — in fact, one of the most brilliant creative minds I know — but she couldn’t communicate clearly and concisely to save her life.  She would speak in these vague terms and struggle with communicating even the most basic ideas.

I took an acting class with her.  In fact, I’ve mentioned her on this blog before (you know, McPsycho).  She would stand up and give us an assignment in vague terms.  ”Okay class,” she would say.  ”You’re going to come back on Monday, and you’re going to wait…” and then walk out the door.  She didn’t say what we were waiting for, nor did she clarify on the comment at all.  On Monday, class began, and she asked me to begin.  I had no idea what she was talking about, of course, and she marked me down for a zero for the day’s assignment.  The next student must’ve decided he didn’t want a zero, so he stood up in front of the class and waited for her to tell him what to do.

“Brilliant!” she cried.

The guy who was waiting for her to tell him what to do was clearly confused, but he just kept doing what he was doing and finally she said “That’s great, thank you” and he sat down.  And slowly it dawned on the class what she was asking us to do.

She wanted us to ACT like we were waiting, without saying “I’m waiting” in clear terms.

She could’ve said that, but instead, she gave a vague something and expected us to understand.

Two years later, I got cast in a show that she was directing.  It was a southern drama, very heavy racist tones.  My character was deliciously evil.  I was horrified at some of the things I had to say, but being able to step into the character was a blast, even if the show was incredibly depressing.

About halfway through the rehearsal process, making major changes every night (not simple cues or instructions, but entirely reconstructing scenes each night, well past when things should have been locked in), she finally gave us her final instruction:  ”Think ‘passionate timebomb’.”

We looked at each other and then back at her.

“What’s that mean?” I said.

“You know,” she answered.  ”Passionate… timebomb.  You’re like timebombs.. but passionate.”

It took us several days of rehearsal before we finally understood what she meant, but any time we asked for clarification, she’d repeat those two words to us.

“Passionate timebomb!”

Completely useless.

Later, after I realized what she meant, I understood that she could have worded it in much clearer terms that would’ve achieved an equal, if not better, effect.  Instead of understanding what she wanted and achieving the desired outcome immediately, we spent several days trying different things until something clicked and she said “Perfect!” and we locked it in.  Instead of clarity and efficiency, we spent time frustrated and confused.

Over my years in theatre, I’ve been trying to improve my oral communications skills.  I’ve got some speech impediment problems that I’m working through (namely, I slur or run words together sometimes), but in terms of speaking in front of a large audience, I’m a thousand times better than I was just five years ago.  I work best off a script, but I can certainly deal in an improvisation scenario.

I’ve had to utilize my oral communications skills outside of a theatre many times, mostly during my years of teaching public schools.  I had to stand up in front of anywhere from 10 to 35 students at a time and teach them.  That means speaking clearly and concisely, in no uncertain terms, about what nouns and pronouns are.  I had to answer questions confidently and authoritatively.

One of the biggest hurdles I had to overcome was my lack of improvisation skills.  Each day I had to prepare a lesson, and each day I worked from a basic outline.  But speaking interactively with students of various levels and personalities meant that I was working from a different “script” each time I taught the lesson.  Essentially, I was putting on six different performances each day, catering each one to its individual audience.

This took a huge amount of effort on my part to learn to speak in front of people asking questions, who had confused expressions or had never been exposed to this particular subject matter.  In the end, I overcame a lot of my anxiety and dread at speaking improvisationally in front of students, and now I feel that my skills have improved to the point where I could teach a class and not have many confused looks at all.  In fact, I’m positive I could have explained McPsycho’s ideas in better terms than she did.

As you can see, a major component in success in any field, theatre or otherwise, is excellent oral communications skills.   Clear communication can push your production from “good” to “phenomenal” very quickly.  Clear, concise communication can get past confusion and frustration and ease the way to understanding and efficiency.

Had McPsycho learned to communicate her ideas in a more clear fashion, the show might’ve been a lot better and a lot tighter.

Have you ever had any situations where bad communication skills got in the way of getting things done?  Do you have any success stories?  Tell me about them in the comments.  I’d love to hear them!

Project: Introspection

Saturday, November 1st, 2008

As I’m sure you’ve noticed, over the last few months I’ve posted less and less frequently.  Part of this has been my distance from theatrical endeavors, part of it has been a lack of inspiration, and part has been that I’ve simply been busy with other things.  I’ve been focusing on my new job in Chicago, getting settled in, and some personal drama (not the stage kind!) that’s been going on lately in my life.  As a result, I’ve spent the last few days questioning whether I should even continue with my theatre goals.

The conclusion that I’ve come to is that I shouldn’t quit theatre.  I guess that’s obvious, but it took me awhile to realize that.  I love theatre.  It’s one of the few things I can count on to make me happy, content and fulfilled no matter what.

So in an effort to revitalize my blog, re-energize myself, and put the focus back on theatre, I’m beginning Project: Introspection.  This will be a series of about 25 blog posts that will focus on different things that I’ve learned about myself, about theatre, and about life that specifically correspond to skills that I’ve learned by participating in theatre.  What follows is a list of the qualities that I will write about over the next month.  And yes, this will correspond with NaNoWriMo.  Not sure if I’ll reach their 50,000 word requirement, but we’ll see how that goes.  I’m treating NaNoWriMo as a challenge to write every day, at any rate.  Wish me luck.

Note: I will be writing about each of the following items, but not necessarily in order.

The List (updated as posts become published)

  1. Oral Communication Skills
  2. Creative Problem Solving Abilities
  3. More than “Get it done” attitude
  4. Motivation and Commitment
  5. Willingness to Work Cooperatively
  6. Ability to Work Independently
  7. Time-budgeting skills
  8. Initiative
  9. Promptness and Respect for Deadlines
  10. Acceptance of Rules
  11. The Ability to Learn Quickly AND Correctly
  12. Respect for Colleagues
  13. Respect for Authority
  14. Adaptability and Flexibility
  15. The Ability to Work Under Pressure
  16. A Healthy Self-Image
  17. Acceptance of Disappointment — and the Ability to Bounce Back
  18. Self-Discipline
  19. A Goal-Oriented Approach to Work
  20. Concentration
  21. Dedication
  22. Willingness to Accept Responsibility
  23. Leadership Skills
  24. Self-Confidence
  25. Enjoyment

Some of these are pretty obvious survival skills that any theatre person would recognize.  Some are a little vague.  I will explain the skills in further detail in each post.

My hope is that this project will encourage me to get back into writing regularly, evaluate myself and get some perspective on my theatre skills and history, and encourage others to continue pursuing theatre and implementing these skills to the best of their ability.

I encourage all of my readers to embark upon similar challenges.  Set a goal, make it a project, and post every day on your chosen niche/topic.  Teach us and show us how to be better at our chosen field.

What can ya do?

Friday, February 1st, 2008

One of the biggest problems that I face in my local theatre is a large sense of apathy. Most of the people here bitch and moan about how they didn’t get cast in this, they didn’t get cast in that, the theatre’s screwing them out of this, screwing them out of that. They complain and complain, and the department looks the other way. Why? Because they won’t help themselves.

The solution, obviously, is to produce their own shows — do what Scott Walters’ suggests, and work together and do small scenes together, monologues, 10 minute plays. The solution is to do their own work. The theatre doesn’t owe them anything. The theatre will, however, help those who help themselves.

A good example is a few years ago, one of the seniors embarked upon her senior project. She proposed a drama camp during the summer for kids. The rest of the department loved the idea, and so it happened. She ran it almost entirely by students, with only one faculty member assisting in scene painting. By the end of a week, the kids had performed a show for their parents. It was a huge success, raising the student drama society about $3000. Naturally, the department picked this up, and now it’s a departmental, annual thing run fully by the theatre (with assistance from students).

So, clearly, the theatre itself will assist a project, and maybe even take it on permanently, if the students, actors, and crew will start it and it proves to be successful.

Unfortunately, nobody wants to get off their asses to do so. In the past two years, there have been a handful of attempts to encourage and provide acting opportunities, including: three student-directed plays (including two by me), an improv theatre troupe (failed), and a cabaret (failed). The latter two failed largely because of a lack of participation. Everyone (well, in general) would rather sit around and bitch to each other than get off their butts and participate.

Which brings me to my conclusion. I’m going to echo, once again, Scott Walters. He has a brilliant plan to inspire change in local-actor hiring practices, but he makes a point, too: people don’t want to put themselves at risk if they don’t have to.

So, obviously, the trick is to provide them with an appropriate desire-to-laziness ratio. That is, the desire to participate must overcome their laziness. This worked in the two shows that I directed, because the students involved were sufficiently motivated to perform on stage — they were small shows and almost everyone had what could be termed a “lead role”, which motivated them to perform. Unfortunately, those kinds of shows aren’t the kinds of things that can be easily repeated. They would need to be something that worked so well that the theatre could pick it up, but similar enough that you don’t need to do an entirely new creative process every time (like, say, the drama camp). In addition, you need to have one person who is willing to do the vast majority of the work and is able to delegate the small tasks to their friends who are helping.

To summarize:

1) People are lazy
2) We need projects to do
3) The projects need to be low-risk, short in time-span, yet still produce results
4) They need to be easy to participate in
5) They need to be repeatable with minimal supervision

So what kinds of things can we do? Hmm.

I’ll get back to you on that.